0

Your Cart

0
Subtotal: AUD0
No products in the cart.

Surface Material Resistivity

Typical resistivity values of surface layer materials used in substations
Crushed blue metal rock and foundation in switchyard 1 scaled - Surface Material Resistivity

Why use surface material layers in substations?

Inside a substation (often as well as outside the perimeter fence) you will notice a layer of rock or crushed stone, or asphalt. The thickness of this additional surface layer typically ranges from 8-15 cm and there are two main reasons for including it being that:

  1. It helps to avoid the drying out of topsoil layers during prolonged dry weather periods; and
  2. It has a very large effect on reducing body currents resulting from touch and step voltages involving a person’s feet.

With regards to the second point, field tests with and without the surface layer have revealed a reduction in body currents in the order of 20 time less. Therefore, covering the surface with a material of high resistivity is very valuable in reducing electric shock currents so it’s common practice. Note it is very important that the integrity of the surface layers is maintained to avoid a compromise in safety.

How to use surface layers for earthing designs

The additional surface layer is included in our calculations for safe touch and step voltage limits using software. When no specific information about the actual surface material resistivity is available the following data may be used [3]:

  • Typical crushed rock has a wet resistivity of 3000 Ω.m and a min. thickness of 100 mm.
  • Typical asphalt has a wet resistivity of 10,000 Ω.m and a min. thickness of 50 mm. Mitigation of touch or step voltages using asphalt layer should not be performed where touch or step voltages exceed 3 kV and 5 kV respectively due to low flashover withstand of asphalt.

It is up to the designer to confirm wet resistivity value of the actual material being used at site is at least as high as those being assumed in the design model.

Typical surface material resistivities

Typical wet and dry resistivities of materials used for substations are given in Table 1 [1]. Local conditions, size, and type of stone may affect the value of resistivity therefore it is important that the resistivity of rock samples typical of the type being used in a given area be measured.

Table 1—Typical surface material resistivities

Number Description of surface material (U.S. state where found) Resistivity of sample ohm-meter
Dry Wet
1 Crusher run granite with fines (NC) 140 × 10 6 1300 (ground water, 45 Ω.m)
2 1.5 in (0.04 m) crusher run granite (GA) with fines 4000 1200 (rain water, 100 Ω.m)
3 0.75 in to 1 in (0.02 m to 0.025 m) granite (CA) with fines -- 6513 (10 min after 45 Ω.m water drained)
4 #4 (1 in to 2 in) (0.025 m to 0.05 m) washed granite (GA) 1.5 × 106 to 4.5 × 106 5000 (rain water, 100 Ω.m
5 #3 (2 in to 4 in) (0.05 m to 0.1 m) washed granite (GA) 2.6 × 106 to 3 × 106 10 000 (rain water, 100 Ω.m)
6 Size unknown, washed limestone (MI) 7 × 106 2000 to 3000 (ground water, Ω.m)
7 Washed granite, similar to 0.75 in (0.02 m) gravel 2 × 106 10 000
8 Washed granite, similar to pea gravel 40 × 106 5000
9 #57 (0.75 in) (0.02 m) washed granite (NC) 190 × 106 8000 (ground water, 45 Ω.m)
10 Asphalt 2 × 106 to 30 × 106 10 000 to 6 × 106
11 Concrete 1 × 106 to 1 × 109a 21 to 100

Note that over time the resistivity of surface materials may be reduced through compression and other environmental factors resulting in filling of voids. A surface material exposed to sea spray may have substantially lower resistivity than for that same material installed at inland substations. These factors should be considered during the design phase as well as after the substation is in service.

It is usually recommended that wet resistivity tests be performed for a particular surface layer stone being used for a substation project or by a power utility. The resistivity test of a crushed rock sample is relatively simple (refer to [2]) and does not require a complex laboratory setup.

References:

[1] IEEE Std 80 – IEEE Suide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding

[2] IEEE Std 81:2012 – IEEE Guide for Measuring Earth Resistivity, Ground Impedance, and Earth Surface Potentials of a Grounding System

[3] ENA EG-0:2010 – Power system earthing guide.

SafeGrid Earthing Software

Easily design safe earthing systems in compliance with Standards.

Related Articles:

Experienced electrical engineers created this reference list of standards for power systems earthing/grounding for substations, renewable energy, etc.
Understand how software simulations enhance grid impedance tests, improving accuracy and efficiency in earthing system design and performance evaluation.
This report explains how to perform accurate earth fault current analysis for substations connected by cable transmission lines. Earth fault currents for simple cable and overhead transmission lines are explained first. Next, two case studies involving hybrid cable transmission lines are presented.
Copper is often preferred for its superior electrical properties, while aluminum and galvanized steel are chosen for cost-effectiveness. Copper-clad steel can offer a balance between cost and performance. This article demonstrates which option is best for different scenarios.
The technical guide explains the electrical systems, local WTG and combined earthing system design, touch and step voltage hazards, soil electrical resistivity measurements, earth fault currents, earthing system software modelling, and validation testing of earthing for wind farms.
There are two reasons, according to the standards, why crushed rock or gravel is laid in substations, as explained in this article.

Print this article:

Print

SafeGrid Earthing Software

An electrical device with software and a graph on its screen.

Easily design safe earthing systems in compliance with Standards.

As used by:

SafeGrid Earthing Clients