6

Your Cart

6
Subtotal: AUD824

Multilayer Soil Effects on Earthing Grid Resistance

Earthing system behaviour in multilayer soils

This paper presents calculation results for an earthing system in 3-layer soil and examines the influence of the upper soil resistivity, upper soil layer thickness, middle soil resistivity, middle soil thickness and lower soil resistivity on the calculated earthing grid resistance.

The results are calculated using SafeGrid Earthing software and these are compared with results of a study done using CDEGS Software [1].

Surface voltages 3D plot 768x332 - Multilayer Soil Effects on Earthing Grid Resistance

Figure 1. Surface voltages plot for the first test with upper layer soil resistivity of 10 Ω.m

Grid model

A simple grid was modelled with properties as:

SafeGrid Earthing software does not assume an equipotential grid therefore the complex series impedances of the grid conductors (assuming the conductivity of steel) were also considered. The frequency of excitation (fault) current was 50 Hz.

Multilayer soil model

Unless otherwise specified, each test will have the following soil parameters:

Influence of the upper soil layer

The effect of the upper layer on grounding resistance was examined by varying:

  1. Resistance of the upper layer between 10 and 70 Ω.m.
  2. Thickness of the upper layer between 10 m and 70 m.

The soil model for the first test is given in Figure 2, and the soil model for the second test is given in Figure 3.

The calculated results which are given in Figures 4 and 5 were compared with referenced study [1].

Figure 2 - Soil Model for upper soil resistivity test

Figure 2.Soil model – varying the upper layer resistivity

Figure 3 - Soil model for upper soil thickness test

Figure 3: Soil model – varying upper layer thickness

Figure 4 shows as upper layer resistivity increases so too does grid resistance. The results using SafeGrid software are quite close to the referenced study [1] which was using CDEGS software, with only a maximum difference of 3.28%.

Figure 5 shows as upper layer thickness increases the grid resistance goes down. This is because the resistivity of upper layer is lower than the middle layer. The results using SafeGrid software are quite close to the referenced study [1] which was using CDEGS software, with only a maximum difference of 2.14%.

Figure 4 - Upper soil resistivity vs grounding resistance

Figure 4.Plot showing the effects of upper soil resistivity on grounding resistance

Figure 11 - Upper soil thickness vs grounding resistance

Figure 5. Plot showing the effects of upper soil thickness on grounding resistance

Influence of the Upper layer

The effect of the middle layer on grounding resistance was tested by measuring the following:

  1. Resistivity of the middle layer, ranging from 50 to 700 Ω.m.
  2. Thickness of the middle layer between 10 m and 80 m

The soil model for the first middle layer test can be seen in Figure 6, and the soil model for the second can be seen in Figure 7.

Figure 5 - Soil model for middle soil resistivity test

Figure 6. Soil model – varying middle layer resistivity

Figure 6 - Soil model for middle soil thickness test
Figure 7. Soil model – varying middle layer thickness

Figure 8 shows that as the middle soil resistivity increases, so does the grounding resistance. However, the curve also begins to flatten out at around the 300 Ω.m point. This is due to the diminishing effects of changes in the middle soil layer resistivity. Additionally, Figure 6 shows that the results in SafeGrid and the results from the referenced study using CDEGS [1] are very close, where the maximum difference between two values for this simulation is 1.81%.

Figure 9 shows that as the thickness of the middle soil layer increases, the grounding resistance decreases. While this is similar to the trend of increasing thickness of the upper soil layer, note that the reduction of grounding resistance is actually much lower than the upper soil layer, due to the less prominent diffusion effect the middle soil layer has on the grid. Figure 8 also shows that the results between the simulation in SafeGrid and the simulation in the referenced study [1] using CDEGS are similar. The maximum difference between values for this simulation is 3.02%.

Figure 7 - Middle soil resistivity vs grounding resistance

Figure 8. Plot showing the effects of middle layer resistivity on grounding resistance

Figure 8 - Middle soil thickness vs grounding resistance
Figure 9. Plot showing the effects of middle layer thickness on grounding resistance

Influence of the Lower Layer

The effect of the lower layer on grounding resistance was tested by measuring differing resistivities of the soil, ranging from 500 to 2000 Ω.m. Varying thickness is not measured, as it is assumed for any given soil model that the lowest layer has an infinite thickness.

A soil model for the lower layer resistivity test can be seen in Figure 10 below.

FIgure 9 - Soil model for lower soil resistivity test
Figure 10.Soil model – varying lower layer resistivity

Figure 11 shows the effects of lower soil resistivity on grounding resistance. As lower soil resistivity increases so does the grounding resistance. Note that this increase gradually decreases as the resistivity gets higher. This is due to the lesser diffusion effect the lower soil layer has on the grid. If the resistivity were to increase further, the upper and middle layers would play a stronger role in diffusion, meaning that the curve would eventually flatten out. Additionally, Figure 10 shows that the results of the simulations in SafeGrid and in the referenced study [1] are close. The greatest difference in data points for this simulation is only 2%.

Figure 10 - Lower soil resistivity vs grounding resistance
Figure 11. Plot showing the effects of lower layer resistivity on grounding resistance

Conclusion

This study examined the effects of varying soil layer resistivity and thicknesses on grid resistance for earthing systems installed in multilayer soils.

In conclusion, increasing the resistivity of soil layers tends to increase the earth grid system resistance, no matter which soil layer that is. This is linked to the reduced effectiveness of the earthing system to dissipate fault current into the soil.

On the other hand, increasing the thickness of soil layers will increase their relative impact on the grid resistance. For example, when the thickness of a layer with relatively high resistivity is increased the grid resistance will increase.

Note that the behaviour of earthing systems in multilayer soils is very different compared with uniform or 2-layer soils.

References

[1] C. Hu, D. Wen, Y. Sun, Y. Wu, Y. Chen & L. Zhou, “Study on the Frequency Characteristics of Grounding Resistance in Non-uniform Soil Regions”, Preprints of the 5th international conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies, November 2015, pp. 1752-1756.

SafeGrid Earthing Software

Easily design safe earthing systems in compliance with Standards.

Related Articles:

Experienced electrical engineers created this reference list of standards for power systems earthing/grounding for substations, renewable energy, etc.
Understand how software simulations enhance grid impedance tests, improving accuracy and efficiency in earthing system design and performance evaluation.
This report explains how to perform accurate earth fault current analysis for substations connected by cable transmission lines. Earth fault currents for simple cable and overhead transmission lines are explained first. Next, two case studies involving hybrid cable transmission lines are presented.
Copper is often preferred for its superior electrical properties, while aluminum and galvanized steel are chosen for cost-effectiveness. Copper-clad steel can offer a balance between cost and performance. This article demonstrates which option is best for different scenarios.
The technical guide explains the electrical systems, local WTG and combined earthing system design, touch and step voltage hazards, soil electrical resistivity measurements, earth fault currents, earthing system software modelling, and validation testing of earthing for wind farms.
There are two reasons, according to the standards, why crushed rock or gravel is laid in substations, as explained in this article.

Print this article:

Print

SafeGrid Earthing Software

An electrical device with software and a graph on its screen.

Easily design safe earthing systems in compliance with Standards.

As used by:

SafeGrid Earthing Clients