Table of Contents
What is Selective Coordination?
Selective coordination refers to the strategic arrangement and setting of protective devices (such as circuit breakers, fuses, and relays) within an electrical system to ensure that only the device closest to the fault operates while the rest remain unaffected.
This approach isolates the faulted section quickly and minimises disruption to the remaining parts of the electrical network. By carefully adjusting the time-current characteristics of each device, selective coordination ensures that faults are managed hierarchically, enhancing the electrical system’s reliability and safety while preventing unnecessary outages and equipment damage.
Selective Coordination in Action
Consider the electrical network example shown in the figure below. If there is a fault downstream of protective Device 7, the fault current will be fed from the upstream supply.
Selective coordination results in only Device 7 opening to isolate the fault from its source. All other devices shown would remain closed to maximise service continuity and minimise load disruption.

- Device 3 or Device 4 could trip, disconnecting the loads supplied from Devices 5, 6, and 7.
- Device 1 could trip, disconnecting the entire installation from supply.
Devices are selected and set to achieve selective coordination so that downstream devices operate faster than upstream devices. Remember that coordination will rarely, if ever, be perfect. That is why setting the prioritisation of tripping is necessary.
Let’s take a closer look at selective coordination by comparing the time-current curves of two devices that are in series. The tripping curve of Device 1 is located to the right of Device 2 on the time-current curve.
For a fault downstream of Device 2, due to selective coordination, the following occurs:
For a fault current of 120 A (Ifault1), the trip time of Device 2 is around 1.5 seconds, while the trip time for Device 1 is around 1000 seconds.
For a fault current of 220 A (Ifault2), the trip time of Device 2 is around 0.15 seconds, while the trip time for Device 1 is around 2.5 seconds.

Note from the time-current curve if the fault current exceeds 1000 A then selective coordination cannot exist. In this scenario, it is uncertain which device would trip first, and both Device 1 and Device 2 would likely trip and/or be damaged.
Setting Priorities for Tripping
In typical installations, several protective devices are along the path between the fault location and the source. This makes selective coordination difficult, if not impossible, in most situations. The image below shows the overlapping time-current curves of several devices in the series, which means that under certain fault conditions, multiple devices will trip simultaneously.

There is a logical method for prioritising protective devices, which can improve the reliability of your electrical network. Setting priorities for protective device tripping will ensure that faults are effectively isolated while minimising disruptions to the rest of the system.
There is a relatively simple priority system with two priority levels: If you must intentionally miscoordinate any protective devices, they should be Level 2 priority.
Device Priority
Description
Protective devices are typically on a mains circuit with multiple feeders. If the Level 1 priority device trips, you lose more than one circuit.

In this case, you must have good selectivity between the feeder and mains devices.
Description
Level 2 –
Lower priority
A single device feeding one other device.

In this case, the same load will be disconnected if either device trips.
To design the protection of an electrical network, each path is considered separately, and then the devices are prioritised for protection coordination. This approach ensures that these will be applied to the lowest priority devices, where compromises are necessary with the tripping coordination.
Consider the electrical network shown below. The most important device is 1A, and the second is 1B. Prioritise one circuit (path) at a time. Each path would have a different set of priorities.
