0

Your Cart

0
Subtotal: AUD0
No products in the cart.
Home / Tutorials / Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link

Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link

ELEK SafeGrid Earthing Software V8.0

Click through the steps in the window below. Turn on your speakers to hear the voiceover.

Overview of the problem

The high-voltage transmission lines connected between substations are predominantly constructed with overhead powerlines. In urban areas, it is common for an underground cable link to be installed in the middle of an overhead transmission line (referred to as a siphon system).

The transition between underground cables and overhead lines (UG/OH) occurs at either transition poles for medium voltage (MV) or above-ground ancillary facilities such as cable-sealing end compounds or cable-sealing end platforms typically with metallic security fences for high-voltage (HV) transmission lines.

Excessive EPR is likely to occur at a UG/OH transition of a siphon transmission system. The highest EPR at the UGOH transition will most likely occur for a fault at the substation, not necessarily a fault at the transition itself. Refer to our technical article Fault Current Distribution for Cable Transmission Lines.

In this tutorial, we use ELEK SafeGrid Earthing Software to model the earth fault current distribution for two substations connected by a siphon transmission system.

An electrical power system schematic showing an overhead transmission line with underground cable link.
Figure 1 - Schematic of a siphon transmission system

System parameters

info - Modelling an Earth Fault on an Overhead Transmission Line with an Underground Cable Link

A table with the exact system parameters used for the modelling is in the Appendix.

A 230 kV overhead transmission line is connected between two substations and consists of a single circuit using AACSR/GZ Olive 1120 conductors and a single earth (shield) wire that has a total length of 10 km. A cable link is inserted in the middle of this line with a total length of 3 km. The cables are single core XLPE insulated cables with 800 mm² copper conductor and a metallic screen, arranged in a flat formation with 250 mm distance between cables. At the cross-bonding joints the cable positions are not transposed but the screens are connected as is typical for cross-bonded circuits. The single point bonded section is equipped with an ecc of 240 mm² (copper), which is located as usual at 70 % of the cable distance between the phases (175 mm to centre phase). The position of the ecc is transposed in the middle of the single point bonded section. The length of every section shall be 500 m.


How to model

Three single-phase-to-earth fault scenarios are modelled. The first fault scenario is at Substation A, whilst the second and the third fault scenarios are at the underground and overhead (UG/OH) transition stations. The fault current distribution and earth potential rise (EPR) are obtained at critical locations for comparison.  

Electrical schematic diagram showing faults at Substation A, Overhead, UGOH A, Cables (cross-bonded), UGOH B, and Substation B. Also includes images of substation infrastructure at the bottom.
Figure 2 - Equivalent circuit diagram of the siphon system showing the simulated earth fault locations

Results examined

The earth fault currents and earth potential rise (EPR) for the main earthing points was recorded (refer to the table in the Appendix).

info - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable LinkThe naming of the node points used by default in the software needs to be translated to the earthing point locations based on the equivalent circuit diagram.

Figure 3 shows a plot of the EPR absolute magnitude at the critical earth point locations for various fault scenarios (locations). The blue bars indicate that a fault a Substation A causes low EPR’s at the substation ends, but high EPR’s at the UG/OH transitions. A fault at the UG/OH A (orange bars) causes high EPR at UG/OH B and Substation B. The highest EPR is at UG/OH transition B (green bar).

Bar chart titled "Earth potential rise at earthing points" comparing faults at Substation A, UG/OH transition A, UG/OH transition B, and Substation B with data for Faults at Substation A, UG/OH A, and UG/OH B.
Figure 3 - Plot of earth potential rise (EPR) at the critical locations for various faults
Figure 4 shows a plot of the absolute magnitude of grid currents at the critical earth point locations for various fault scenarios (locations). An earth fault at Substation A (blue bars) causes relatively high earth fault currents to flow into the earth at Substation A and B, but because the impedance of these grids is only 0.2 Ω, their EPR is low (Figure 3).

info - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable LinkA cable link of length 9 km (3 times longer) results in an increase of 10.3 % of the highest EPR at UG/OH B, but a much larger increase of 59.5 % of the EPR at Substation A.

Bar chart displaying earth grid current at different substations and transitions. Substation A shows values 6059, 3449, 1188; UG/OH transition A: 3426, 2467, 421; UG/OH transition B: 3999, 2458, 415; Substation B: 6176, 5745, 5662.
Figure 4 - Plot of earth grid currents at the critical locations for various faults
An earth fault at Substation A results in high EPR at both UG/OH earth points, but not the highest EPR. An earth fault at UG/OH A and UG/OH B causes the highest EPR’s at UG/OH B (Figure 3) due to a high proportion of the prospective 10,000 A fault current entering the ground at UG/OH transition B (orange and green bars in Figure 4) and only a low portion is not returning to the source via the overhead earth wire. The earth grid at the UG/OH transition B also has a relatively high resistance of 1.56 Ω.

info - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable LinkA cable link of length 9 km (3 times longer) for an earth fault at Substation A results in significant increases in the grid currents at
UG/OH transitions A and B, by up to 59.7 %.

Appendix - Calculated results

Cable length 1000 m per section

The table below shows the EPR and grid currents for various fault scenarios.
LocationEPR (V)Earth grid current (A) and split factor (%)
Substation A

Fault at Substation A

Fault at UG/OH transition A

Fault at UG/OH transition B


1179 -279 i

1 -39 i

140 -192 i


5896 -1395 i (59 %) - EG LOCAL [4, 5]

3 -193 i (<1 %) - L2_EG REMOTE [35, 36]

700 -960 i (7 %) - L2_EG REMOTE [35, 36]
UG/OH transition station A

Fault at Substation A

Fault at UG/OH transition A

Fault at UG/OH transition B



-2533 -2879 i

500 -469 i

4173 -596 i [NODE 30 - NODE 31]



-1623 -1845 i (16 %) - L1_EARTH POINT [9, 10]

2498 -2344 i (25 %) - EG LOCAL [4, 5]

417 -60 i (2 %) - L2_TOWER [30, 31]
UG/OH transition station B

Fault at Substation A

Fault at UG/OH transition A

Fault at UG/OH transition B



2527 +2884 i (NODE 30 - NODE 31)

4415 +2826 i [NODE 25 - NODE 26]

6164 +963



1620 +1849 i (16 %) - L1_TOWER [30, 31]

2830 +1811 i (28 %) - L1_TOWER [25, 26]

3951 +617 i (40 %) - EG LOCAL [4, 5]
Substation B

Fault at Substation A

Fault at UG/OH transition A

Fault at UG/OH transition B


-1202 +284 i

-1130 +205 i

-1137 +61 i


-6011 +1420 i (60 %) - L1_EG REMOTE [35, 36]

-5652 +1027 i (57 %) - L1_EG REMOTE [30, 31]

-5684 +307 i (57 %) - L1_EG REMOTE [9, 10]

Cable length 3000 m per section (long line)

The table below shows the EPR and grid currents for various fault scenarios.

LocationEPR (V)Earth grid current (A) and split factor (%)
Substation A L2_EG REMOTE[35, 36]

Fault at Substation A

Fault at UG/OH transition A

Fault at UG/OH transition B



1067 -170 i (EG LOCAL [4, 5])

-5 -22 i

55 -139 i (L2_EG REMOTE [35, 36])



5336 -850 i (53 %)

-24 -110 i (<1 %)

273 -696 i (3 %)
UG/OH transition station A EG LOCAL [4, 5]

Fault at Substation A

Fault at UG/OH transition A

Fault at UG/OH transition B



-5357 -2960 i (L1_EARTH POINT [9, 10])

220 -334 i

2444 -1026 i [NODE 30 - NODE 31]



-3434 -1898 i (34 %)

1100 -1670 i (11 %)

244 -103 i (2 %)
UG/OH transition station B L1_TOWER [25, 26]

Fault at Substation A

Fault at UG/OH transition A

Fault at UG/OH transition B


5352 +2965 i (NODE 30 - NODE 31)

6465 +2311 i [NODE 25 - NODE 26]

6824 +868 i (EG LOCAL [4, 5])


3430 +1901 i (34 %)

4138 +1481 i (41 %)

4374 +557 i (44 %)
Substation B L1_EG REMOTE [30, 31]

Fault at Substation A

Fault at UG/OH transition A

Fault at UG/OH transition B


-1071 +103 i

-5354 +513 i

-1115 +31 i (L1_EG REMOTE [9, 10])


-5354 +513 i (54 %)

-5439 +865 i (54 %)

-5574 +155 i (56 %)
Bar chart showing earth grid current for a long cable line at Substations A and B, and UG/OH transitions A and B, with faults at each location. The units are in amperes.
Figure 5 - Plot of earth grid currents at the critical locations for various faults (long cable line)
Bar chart comparing earth potential rise at earthing points for Substation A, UG/OH transition A, UG/OH transition B, and Substation B, with faults at Substations A and B, and UG/OH B.
Figure 6 - Plot of earth potential rise (EPR) at the critical locations for various faults (long cable line)

Fault at Substation A

Steps to create this arrangement:
  • Consists of a single line.
  1. Create 1 section of CASE 7 and enter the data for that.
  2. Copy that section by pressing Copy Section
  3. Go back to the first section and press Add Section. Change the new section to CASE 6 and enter the data.
Section Inputs
1 1 image 20240419 041915 - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link
1 2 image 20240419 041915 - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link
1 3 image 20240419 041915 - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link

Fault at UGOH transition A

Steps to create this arrangement:
  • Consists of two lines.
  1. Create an overhead line section for Line 1 as CASE 7 and enter the data for that.
  2. Copy Line.
  3. Go back to Line 1 and press Add Section. Change the new section to CASE 6 and enter the data
Line Section Inputs
1 1 Match all the inputs image 20240419 042137 - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link
1 2 image 20240419 042137 - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link
2 1 image 20240419 042137 - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link

Fault at UGOH transition B

Steps to create this arrangement:

  • Consists of two lines.
  1. Create an overhead line section for Line 1 as CASE 7 and enter the data for that.

  2. Copy Line.
  3. Go back to Line 1 and press Add Section. Change the new section to CASE 6 and enter the data.

Line Section Inputs
1 1 Match all the inputs image 20240419 042137 - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link
2 1 image 20240419 042137 - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link
2 2 image 20240419 042137 - Modelling an Overhead Transmission Line with Underground Cable Link

Related Tutorials:

With the Fall of Potential Test, the resistance of an earthing system is measured using a remote earth electrode. There is a theoretical position of 61.8 % of the separation distance between the measured grid and the remote electrode, which is the correct position for measuring the exact grid impedance for uniform soil resistivity but not for multilayer soils. This tutorial shows ELEK SafeGrid Earthing Software users how to simulate an FOP test.
This video tutorial focuses on the design and modelling of Earthing Systems for Wind Farms and Solar PV Farms. Real-world examples are provided and are explained.
ELEK SafeGrid Earthing Software can perform calculations in the time domain such as for lightning currents. Transient waveforms are composed of many frequency components and Fourier transforms are used. The transient waveform types include IEC 62305, CIGRE, Heidler, Double-exponential, and Custom. The time-domain response of an earthing system can be analysed.
SafeGrid can model custom earthing arrangements of any size or shape in 2D or 3D. You can specify the grid using the in-built editor tools or you can import grids drawn in AutoCAD.
This video (25 min) tutorial shows the main features of SafeGrid Earthing Software for performing an earthing designs and explains the design process.
Example Rolling Sphere Method calculation which shows how to overlay protection systems such as lightning masts and earth wires on a site drawing.