0

您的购物车

0
小计 AUD0
购物车中没有产品。

混凝土接地棒

A practical guide for improving earthing performance and economics

Concrete is hygroscopic which means it absorbs water and when concrete is buried, depending on the moisture levels at the time of the surrounding soil, it behaves as a semiconducting medium. Concrete has a typical electrical resistivity of between 30 Ohm.m to 200 Ohm.m [1]. It has been measured that wet concrete resistivity is almost uniform throughout whereas  regular concrete has an equivalent two layer model consists of a bottom layer having a resistivity of 1244 Ohm.m with 195 Ohm.m for the top layer (interestingly the resistivity of concrete increases with depth/thickness).

Because of the relatively low resistivity of concrete it is known that metallic earthing rods which are encased inside concrete will have a lower resistance to ground at both power frequency and at lightning impulse levels than the same rod which is directly buried into the earth [4].

Therefore concrete encasing of earthing rods can be used to reduce their ground resistance and improve overall earthing system performance. However, it is a costly measure and should be undertaken with some measure of caution. Where there is adequate real estate it may be a better option simply to increase the number of directly buried rods while ensuring adequate horizontal separations (separate them by at least their driven length – read our article on the Fundamentals of Earthing Design) to reduce the proximity effect between multiple buried rods.

There are empirical equations for calculating the resistance for both direct buried and concrete encased earthing rods. There are more accurate methods (described in our article [7]) for modelling concrete encased rods using numerical software.

A black and white illustration of an electrical wire rack.
Figure 1 - Array of concrete-encased earthing rods

Concrete pole bases of transmission lines can act as grounding structures in distribution systems where they have been shown to be a viable and economical alternative in substitution to individual rods especially in high resistivity soils [4]. In the case of low resistivity soils the base pole resistance is larger than that of a single rod. On the other hand, the opposite is observed for high resistivity soil. The same methods described in article [7] can be used for modelling concrete pole foundations for earthing.

The main problems with concrete encased earthing rods are caused to corrosion of the steel reinforcement embedded inside the concrete. When rebar corrodes it expands to about 2.2 times its original volume which can split the concrete foundation. The corrosion of rebar is caused by the flow of stray DC current. The steel rebar and the earthing conductor are electricall connected through the semi-conducting concrete medium. Even if stray DC currents are not present, it’s been shown approximately 0.01% of the AC current which flows into the ground is rectified at the interface of steel and concrete [1]. However, it has also been shown that below a threshold of about 60 V DC that corrosion will not occur.

Note that the rebar inside concrete should always be directly bonded with the earthing since this can reduce the touch voltages significantly (up to 83% in wet conditions) [2].

参考资料

  1. IEEE Std 80-2013, “IEEE Guide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding”.
  2. EPRI, “Touch and Step Voltage Measurements on Field Installed Ground Grid and Concrete Pads”, 2009.
  3. Hugo et al.,”A Feasibility Study on the Use of Concrete Pole Bases as a Grounding Topology for Distribution Systems.”, 2013 International Symposium on Lightning Protection, Brazil.
  4. Cabral et al., “Comparative Performance of Impulse Grounding Systems Embedded in Concrete: An Experiment in Reduced Scale.”, 2016 International Conference on Lightning Protection, Portugal.
  5. Wiener, P., “A Comparison of Concrete Encased Grounding Electrodes to Driven Ground Rods.”, IEEE Transactions on Industry and General Applications 1970.
  6. Electrotechnik, “Fundamentals of Earthing Design”, https://elek.com/articles/fundamentals-of-earthing-design/
  7. Electrotechnik, “Modelling earthing rods surrounded with bentonite”, https://elek.com/articles/modelling-earthing-rods-surrounded-with-bentonite/

Try SafeGrid Earthing Software For accurate modelling of earthing rods.

SafeGrid 接地软件

轻松设计符合标准的安全接地系统。

相关文章

经验丰富的电气工程师为变电站、可再生能源等电力系统的接地/接地标准创建了这份参考清单。
了解软件模拟如何增强电网阻抗测试,提高接地系统设计和性能评估的准确性和效率。
本报告介绍了如何对电缆输电线路连接的变电站进行准确的接地故障电流分析。首先解释了简单电缆和架空输电线路的接地故障电流。接下来,将介绍两个涉及混合电缆输电线路的案例研究。
铜通常因其卓越的电气性能而备受青睐,而铝和镀锌钢则是出于成本效益的考虑。铜包钢可以在成本和性能之间取得平衡。本文介绍了不同情况下的最佳选择。
该技术指南介绍了电气系统、本地风电机组和组合接地系统设计、触电和跨步电压危险、土壤电阻率测量、接地故障电流、接地系统软件建模以及风电场接地验证测试。
根据标准,在变电站内铺设碎石或砾石有两个原因,本文将对此进行说明。

打印本文:

打印

SafeGrid 接地软件

带软件的电子设备,屏幕上有图表。

轻松设计符合标准的安全接地系统。

用于:

安全电网接地客户端